On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 21:25:48 +0100 "Gerard N/A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > > 1. Can you create a patch? See > > http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Creating_A_Patch > > > Sure. > > > 2. Don't use implementation uses sections in the IDE. > > > Ok. > > > 3. Don't load source files from disk. Always use > > > > CodeToolBoss.LoadFile(CleanAndExpandFilename(Filename),true,false). > > > Ok, I'll correct this. (I didn't touch this). > > > 4. Why only for the project directory? > > Sheer ignorance of any alternative method. > > > 5. Why not use the existing functions to get all units and > > include files of projects/packages? > > See above. > Do you mean to parse all the units used by a project including the > LCL? > > > 6. Why not use the existing comment parsing code? It is faster and > > not limited to single line comments. > > Any hint on how to do this? Sure. But I need to know, what you want to achieve. > More in general, can you point me to a some high level description of > the IDE structure and services? There are wiki pages, examples and some toolbox articles. There is no guide for the IDE source code for various reasons. > > Maybe you can describe, what todos the ToDo dialog should maintain? > > > Any Todo displayed by the list? I'm sorry but I think I don't > understand the question. > BTW, I'm not the original author of the Todo list/Add Todo Item > dialog, I just added some functionality, so it's hard for me to answer > questions about the design of these. That makes two of us. So forget for a moment the existing implementation and write what a good ToDo List dialog should do. Mattias _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
