On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 13:17, Martin Hejl wrote: > > Ideally, building from a local working-copy of the repository will be > > fairly easy (it sounds like this is getting tested RealSoonNow). This > > would separate download problems from actually building the source > > (possibly important for those with flaky internet access, or folks using > > the flaky sourceforge CVS servers! :). > > Well, that's what the whole "we supply a tarball of everything you need, > and put it into FRS" approach was all about. But it seems that is not an > approved approach.
Martin, That approach is fine. I just thought the tag approach was easier. -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
