Mike Noyes wrote: > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 13:17, Martin Hejl wrote: > >>>Ideally, building from a local working-copy of the repository will be >>>fairly easy (it sounds like this is getting tested RealSoonNow). This >>>would separate download problems from actually building the source >>>(possibly important for those with flaky internet access, or folks using >>>the flaky sourceforge CVS servers! :). >> >>Well, that's what the whole "we supply a tarball of everything you need, >>and put it into FRS" approach was all about. But it seems that is not an >>approved approach. > > > Martin, > That approach is fine. I just thought the tag approach was easier. >
May I suggest to add a tag anyway for the following reasons - tags do not hurt CVS operation in any way, just make it easier to retrieve a certain version. - tags are easy to add - tags will work with the current buildtool although it is not used by it - adding a tag is faster than to build a tar file, such an archive is a nice shortcut though - adding a tag does not create overhead to the CVS archive (unless we use subversion) my $0.02 Erich _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
