On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 10:07, Erich Titl wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 13:17, Martin Hejl wrote: > > > >>>Ideally, building from a local working-copy of the repository will be > >>>fairly easy (it sounds like this is getting tested RealSoonNow). This > >>>would separate download problems from actually building the source > >>>(possibly important for those with flaky internet access, or folks using > >>>the flaky sourceforge CVS servers! :). > >> > >>Well, that's what the whole "we supply a tarball of everything you need, > >>and put it into FRS" approach was all about. But it seems that is not an > >>approved approach. > > > > > > Martin, > > That approach is fine. I just thought the tag approach was easier. > > > > May I suggest to add a tag anyway for the following reasons > > - tags do not hurt CVS operation in any way, just make it easier to > retrieve a certain version. > - tags are easy to add > - tags will work with the current buildtool although it is not used by it > - adding a tag is faster than to build a tar file, such an archive is a > nice shortcut though > - adding a tag does not create overhead to the CVS archive (unless we > use subversion)
Erich, I agree with all the above, and have advocated tag use since 2002. http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05183.html -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
