Steve,
On Fri, 03 Jan 2003 09:29:58 CST Steve Cowles wrote:
bf> Interesting. All my dnscache replies are listed as
bf> non-authoritative. E.g:
bf>
bf> C:\>nslookup www.yahoo.net
[..]
bf> Non-authoritative answer:
bf> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
bf> Name: yahoo.com
bf> Addresses: 66.218.71.198, 64.58.79.230
bf> Aliases: www.yahoo.net
> All queries to your DNS server should be non-authoritative (meaning cached)
> except for the ones that you have configured your DNS server to be the
> "Start of Authority" (SOA). IN which case, you would have a registered
> domain.
Agreed. My point was that Kory claims to be querying dnscache
but is not getting the non-authoritative answers one would
expect from it.
> BTW: Based on the above output of nslookup, your dns server (192.168.70.1)
> is not properly configured for reverse loopup queries. i.e. in-addr.arpa
> zones
You are partially correct. It is not configured to respond to
RFC 1918 reverse lookups. Others work fine:
brad@lab:~$ dig +short -x 216.239.57.101 @192.168.70.1
www.google.com.
I run dnscache set to query the root name servers. I could also
install tinydns to fix the 192.168.70.* reverse lookup issue but
I don't have a good reason to yet.
--Brad
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
