> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:leedslist- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RickD > Sent: 02 August 2007 12:54 > To: leedslist > Subject: Re: [LU] The final countdown > > ----- Original Message ----- > > Oh, and for the avoidance of doubt/clarification, you know full well > Rick > > that is not what I said. > > In that case you must be arguing that Leeds in a one-off and that the > rest > of the League should agree to pay our debts for us on that basis. Why > should > what appliies to Leeds not be the same for every other league club in > the > future ?
No Rick, you said that I suggested FL pay HMRC in full. I did not. Simple equation for you (HMRC Demand - LUFC legal/accepted offer) = what FL should pay They aren't our debts, it is a penalty clause for having to pay football debts in full. We have already given/offered HMRC exactly and legally what they are entitled to. Why should we pay them more than they are entitled to? > > > HMRC has an issue with football, not with LUFC or the % they got per > se. > > You continue to maintain that this is a test case of the football > creditor Didnt say it was a test case did I? I said that was their issue and what they are really fighting for here. > I am not saying that HMRC don't have an issue with the football > creditors > rule because this is an established fact. So we agree then. Jolly good. I'm saying that this is not > (at > present at any rate) a test case of that situation. And we agree again. Hurrah! _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
