On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 17:48:55 -0700, "Janis Gilmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In TMG, events with a date attached sort in chronological order. Events that >do not have a date attached can be sorted either to the top or the bottom of >the list, at your option. Good for them. I have events (actually facts) without dates that I want in the middle. And I have facts that I want in a particular order. >Why would you want the 1880 census to sort after the 1920 census? I want to make that decision. I don't want the software to make it for me. >I think I must be missing something here. I know that custom sorting is >sometimes desirable. But couldn't that be an option, rather than the >default? Custom sorting should be the default because that is the way it works today. I would not want the software to start resorting my data "by default". -- Dennis M. Kowallek [EMAIL PROTECTED] ****************** Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ For online technical support, please visit http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
