> Is
> there any particular reason why the published list of changes CANNOT be
> COMPLETE so that we only need to check problems once, after they are
> supposed to have been fixed?
I would think this would require little extra effort now that the developers
have their new system for tracking bugs and enhancements. My guess is that it
just isn't a high-priority task for them.
--
Dev
+++
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better pen pal.
Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how.
http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/
Give Legacy as a Gift for 25% Off. Visit http://tinyurl.com/2b49et
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
