Perhaps it isn't a high priority task for them...but it darn well should be!
What is the point in fixing bugs if the endusers don't know that they are
fixed??
Why should endusers have to keep testing to see if something that has been
reported has been fixed?
Every update should include a list of ALL changes since the previous update and
should NOT be released until that list is included in said update-period.
----- Original Message ----
From: Dev Null <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:45:53 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Old Issue with Unwanted Punctuation (Period)
> Is
> there any particular reason why the published list of changes CANNOT be
> COMPLETE so that we only need to check problems once, after they are
> supposed to have been fixed?
I would think this would require little extra effort now that the developers
have their new system for tracking bugs and enhancements. My guess is that it
just isn't a high-priority task for them.
--
Dev
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get easy, one-click access to your favorites.
Make Yahoo! your homepage.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Give Legacy as a Gift for 25% Off. Visit http://tinyurl.com/2b49et
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
