It's not a matter that we're *not* going to do it - it's a matter that the way Legacy is structured we *can't* do it at this time without a complete rewrite of the database structure. Of course, that would have a trickle-down effect for the developers of the add-on programs and they'd have to rewrite their programs to accept the new Legacy format.
It's not as simple as flipping a switch or anything. It would be a major undertaking. Believe me, we have enough people writing to us that they'd like this feature so we know it's a popular request and it hasn't fallen from the radar! Thanks for using Legacy. Sherry Customer Support Millennia Corporation [email protected] http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com We are changing the world of genealogy! When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Beverly Walker Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 9:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries We've discussed this in the past and Legacy told us that they were not going to accommodate those of us who have a same-sex partner in the Legacy program. Let's all of us tell them that is important to us to have this in Legacy. If enough of us say we want and need it, they will try to add it as an alternate setting. Beverly Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
