I think what everyone's been telling me her on the list is to include all the
other information to get the person to the correct page and even line #, so they
wouldn't necessarily be going through the standard "enter first and last name
and click 'search' " process.

I have had cases where what was enumerated was wrong (so also indexed
incorrectly).  In those cases I will add "(incorrectly enumerated as 'James')"
in the event notes for Jane's census event, for example.
 --Paula




________________________________
From:Thomas L. Shaw <tls0...@gmail.com>
To:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Tue, May 1, 2012 5:54:44 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] 1940 census template questions

I see your point Jenny...would it make sense to record the obviously correct
entry, followed by the incorrect entry in parentheses?

On May 1, 2012, at 5:19, Jenny M Benson <ge...@cedarbank.me.uk> wrote:

> On 30/04/2012 23:46, mbstx wrote:
>> To me, it's not so much the quality of the image as the quality of the
>> indexing.  There are a multitude of errors in the previous census
>> databases on Ancestry.com (and some in FamilySearch as well, but not as
>> many I believe).  FamilySearch is trying to use indexers who understand
>> the batches they're working one, particularly re surnames, and other
>> things that might be misinterpreted.
>
> But wherever possible one should record what is actually written on the
> Census sheet, not what is obviously a bad transcription.
>
> This is one reason why it's important to cite the full Source, including
> the website.  If a person's name is transcribed (wrongly) as Jane on one
> site and (correctly) as James on another, someone trying to follow up
> your record of Jane, but using a different site to you, might not find
> the record.
>
> Sometimes what is written on the Census sheet is obviously incorrect,
> but I still record exactly what is written.
>
> --
> Jenny M Benson
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
> our
>blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to