The original message to the list is in the attachment. This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy imposed by your email provider. If you want to receive messages without conversion to attachments please use a different email address for your subscription.
--- Begin Message ---There is a reason I put the mother in, instead of the father. That reason is called old age. :) There are times when I don't necessarily think things through before doing them. But it makes sense to put the father in as Mr. Schommer. It can always be changed if something unexpected turns up. I have strong reasons to believe that Nicolaus Schommer is a brother to Maria and Susanna, but I have no hard proof. So he is left out for now, but he is mentioned in other areas why I think he is a brother. Since I haven't added him yet, I guess I haven't completely lost it yet, although I'm working on it. ;) Thanks for the replies. They make a lot of sense. EdOn Wednesday, December 31, 1969 6:00 PM, I Macaulay via LegacyUserGroup <legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com> wrote: The original message to the list is in the attachment. This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy imposed by your email provider. If you want to receive messages without conversion to attachments please use a different email address for your subscription.Ok, You guys know I am a little slow on the uptake, but, I have been watching all this and wondering why the surname does not just get placed in the male parents position and then add the child? Is there some problem that this sets up further down the line that I am not visualizing? Is it that the father may not be the surname carrier? Without a first name and without a source the data should be suspect and there fore equivalent to "unknown" or other place fillers. Ian I live in my own little world, but it's OK. Everyone knows me here. Ian Macaulay Carp, Ontario Open at 10:AM Close at 5:00 PM 45.2397 N long: 76.0991 W Elv 137 M UTM Don't Forget to Save the Stamps From: MikeFry <emjay...@gmail.com> To: legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 3:49 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Entering a sibling without parents On 25 Feb 2016 3:13 AM, Ed Ladendorf via LegacyUserGroup wrote: > For a long time, because of several strong indications, I was reasonably sure > that Susanna Schommer was a sister to my g-grandmother, Maria Schommer. Now I > finally have proof of that. When I went to enter a sibling for Maria, I > recieved a message saying that siblings cannot be entered without first > having a parent. > I have no information whatsoever as to what their parents' names were, so in > my mind, not entering a sibling would be a sin. She needs to be there so > someone other than myself could have a shot of finding something I couldn't > yet find. So I entered a mother with the given name of "Not", and the surname > of "Known". The sibling was then added successfully. Has anyone else had this > problem, and if so, how did you handle it? In a past existence (Legacy 7.5) it was possible, with a parent-less person on show in the Family tab, to double-click on the empty parents and have the program 'create' blank parents. You could then add a sibling to the original, parent-less person. No parents were actually created. This no longer seems to work under version 8.0 -- Regards, Mike Fry (Jhb) _______________________________________________ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com _______________________________________________ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
--- End Message ---
-- _______________________________________________ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com to manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
