-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2014.10.02 21.37, Greg wrote: > Have you read everything in the reddit r/security link I sent you?
Of course not. It turns out I have other things to do than read voluminous ramblings by folks on Reddit who don't actually do field work. I'll add it to my queue for when I've got a slow Sunday. > You have two possible defensible stances based on everything you > have said so far: > > 1. Activists shouldn't encrypt any data whatsoever. > 2. Activists should use Espionage-style PD if they are going to > choose to use encryption. You have failed to demonstrate this in any way, other than by brute force assertion, appear to have no field experience, and frankly, it's not clear if you ever even had a real security audit or cryptographic review. Brute assertion for commercial products, in particular, tends to be indicative of a failure to understand real-world deployment constraints. As does naming something "Espionage", but that's largely irrelevant. I'm going to stop responding to this thread from this point on, because it's clear to me that no further useful discussion will occur here. Everyone else, hopefully this exchange has been educational as far as the kinds of testing we should be seeing tools go through. E. - -- Ideas are my favorite toys. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF4EAREIAAYFAlQtuu4ACgkQQwkE2RkM0wr+vgD/a4pHH9SKosesYRv8G6xfDyjA /JZ0CWTDXTfbpMGDH0sBAJrFO63qudSYMP2cjPs93Fp5/4nv51Xgg3QUrL+xMbN8 =rahm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.
