Uh no.  That's what called seeing the world in one-color.  Reality is somewhat 
more multifactorial.

Pakistan's cried "Uncle" and buckeled under.  There was no need to attack as 
part of the deal with Musharaff.  And it's likely that the news reports that 
were denied in the early post-9/11 era were probably true.  The Pakistani 
nuclear deterrent is under our control.

Israel has been repeatedly attacked by Arabs in spite of their nuclear 
deterrents.  See recent events in Lebanon.  The Israeli's didn't start it.  The 
counterpunch was most appropriate.  They didn't go far enough.  That 10-mile 
strip should have been razed to the ground.

North Korea has something akin to a nuclear firecracker but there is no reason 
to go there. Kim is not suicidal.  And he has more to worry from China than us.

Palestinians were not screwed out of a country.  They were a deliberately 
created by problem by the arabs and the crisis maintained by the arabs.  Please 
see actions by Jordan in the matter that created the exodus that resulted in 
the displaced population you have such concern for.  A problem which could be 
solved overnight by killing the terrorist leaderships and recognizing property 
right and rule of law for the Palestinians.

I will predict right here and right now, that if we don't strike Iran, Israel 
will.  The nuke, certainly has defensive posture uses, but that's not the 
reason they want it.  They want it to do serious mischeif.  Realize that the 
Iranian leadership believes in an EndOfDays litany, and they think the Fire of 
Allah is the way to it.




  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jay P. Hailey 
  To: LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 10:08 PM
  Subject: Re: [LibertarianEnterprise] Think about this:


  > When an Iran
  > wants a nuke, the question that has to be asked is
  "Why?".

  Let's do the math on this -

  Iraq, Iran and N Korea on "Axis of Evil" List.

  Iraq has no WMDs, but has oil, gets attacked.

  N. Korea has no oil but possibly nukes - Not attacked.

  Hmmmm. Doesn't look too much like rocket science to
  me -

  Pakistan - has Nukes Not attacked.

  Even Morrrreeee suggestive. Afghanistan - No Nukes. 
  Has a proposed
  pipeline path - GETS ATTACKED.

  Well sheesh.

  Let's look at this a little further

  Israel - has US Jets and Choppers. Has nukes. Hates
  Muslims.

  Palestinians, no nukes - screwed out of their country
  and ignored at the
  peace table.

  Lebanese. No Nukes - attacked and bombed severely.

  Hmmmmm!!!!

  So if Israel hates me, and America Lusts for my oil,
  having a nuke seems to
  increase the odds I don't get attacked.

  I think the WHY of Iran wanting a Nuke is as plain as
  the nose on my face.
  It renders one Regime Change Resistant

  The thing that fills me with curiousity is why A.Q.
  Khan hasn't sold Iran
  the technology yet.

  -----

  In any case - History is not a one sided story of
  Arabs and Muslims being
  fiends and evil. And anyone who wants to sell you
  that narrative does not
  have your best interests at heart and may even ask you
  for cash donations to
  "Continue the fight against the evil aliens"

  Fear is a tool to make a population pliant. Fear if
  the Arab, Fear of the
  Muslim is a political tool. Who's tool? What do they
  gain?

  Jay ~Meow!~

  __________________________________________________________
  Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know.
  Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com


   

Reply via email to