Does it always have to be an "all-or-nothing" deal?

If it takes a 1000 page document to get freer trade than was had before,
that would be a good thing.  Of course one might wish for a one-sentence
deal like "There shall be no import taxes on good from any party to this
agreement nor shall any party to this agreement subsidize their goods to the
detriment of other parties."  Of course, then there's the question of health
and safety regulations, import inspections, what constitutes an import tax
and what constitutes a subsidy, and....

Now, if you can show me that one or the other of these led to less-free
trade, then you've got a case.

Lowell C. Savage
It's the freedom, stupid!
Gun control: tyrants' tool, fools' folly.


Travis Pahl wrote, in part:
> Actually most libertarians are opposed to NAFTA and CAFTA.  Free trade
> is not a 1000 page document.


_______________________________________________
Libnw mailing list
Libnw@immosys.com
List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw
Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw

Reply via email to