Travis Pahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked: >> Now, if you can show me that one or the other of these led to less-free >> trade, then you've got a case.
>Show me it led to free trade and you have a case. I just Googled for cato AND (nafta OR cafta) and got, not only CATO's, but also Heartland's pronouncements. They're ALL in favor! Heartland's headline on CAFTA is typical, to the effect that CAFTA's not perfect, but is good. CATO sings the praises of 10 years of NAFTA. The trouble is, you complain that they're not perfect. "Show me that it led to free trade", i.e. total freedom in trade. Hell, show me ANYTHING that EVER led to FREE ANYTHING, in the sense of total freedom!! The perfect is the enemy of the good. However, CATO does tell you the benefits of NAFTA over 10 years. Paradise, no. In Your Sly Tribe, Robert _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list Libnw@immosys.com List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
