Travis Pahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I have not taken any official polls. Niether have you. Ron Paul >ruitenly dismisses botha greements as a bad idea and unconstitutional.
Ron Paul is problematic and always has been, from a libertarian's perspective. He's big on national sovereignty and the Constitution, so when those stand in the way of individual liberty he's on the wrong side. > Nearly every libertarian group I am on has most all libertarians >opposiing it. The libertarians I have talked to in person generally >oppose it as well. >Most pundits have expressed support for it in as much as they support >free trade but I have not seen many that support the specifics of >either agreement. I think they are more opposed to what the nafta and >cafta critics say rather than actual being in favor of the agreements >themselves. Well, by definition, YOU are a NAFTA and CAFTA critic. What is it about what people like you say that they oppose? Don't tell me because I already know, having been around on this with NAFTA -- they say the same things that I say: don't over-value national sovereignty, and don't let the perfect defeat the good. In Your Sly Tribe, Robert _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list Libnw@immosys.com List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
