David Boyes wrote:
Probably has to do with the recent (and IMHO not beneficial) renaming of MQ to be part of the Websphere megalith. Not everyone got the memo on the new name, and the phrase "Websphere MQ" commonly still parsed as Websphere + MQ, not just the pure MQ we used to have to cope with. IBM: is it really beneficial to push things that you've built a name for into
It's not just IBM and it's not just USA: Thrive used to be a product: http://yates.com.au/brand/Thrive.asp So did blitzem http://yates.com.au/brand/Blitzem.asp ratsak http://yates.com.au/brand/Ratsak.asp zero http://yates.com.au/brand/Zero.asp dynamic lifter http://yates.com.au/brand/DynamicLifter.asp -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Advice http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375 You cannot reply off-list:-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
