Linux-Advocacy Digest #841, Volume #33 Mon, 23 Apr 01 18:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males (Nomen Nescio)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. ("krasus")
Re: Intel versus Sparc (mlw)
Re: Tired of XEMACS, moving to VIM (Drew Roedersheimer)
Re: Communism (WesTralia)
Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (Chad Everett)
Re: Aaron Kuklis Arrested! ("Joseph T. Adams")
Re: Windows 2000 - It is an excellent product (Nigel Feltham)
Re: Intel versus Sparc
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Ace Agincourt)
Re: Windows 2000 - It is an excellent product ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Windows 2K is crappy: a couple of examples (Nigel Feltham)
Re: Windows 2K is crappy: a couple of examples ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("billh")
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("billh")
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("billh")
Re: Communism ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Why left-wing communist assholes hate Reagan. (was Re:
Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.) (Donovan
Rebbechi)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Nomen Nescio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 23:00:06 +0200 (CEST)
WesTralia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron's hatred of women is really starting to perfectly fit the
> profile of an adult male living in his domineering mother's basement.
actually he lives in the motel
his mother has the basement
jackie 'anakin' tokeman
men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
more even than death
- bertrand russell
------------------------------
From: "krasus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:55:01 +0100
"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Not only that, but the Communists have never relinquished control of the
> old Soviet Union
>
> Perestroika is the Russian word for RESTRUCTURING.
>
> And that's all the Communists did...they RESTRUCTURED Communism in Russia.
He he he he he - what a dimwit.
You really need to get an education. try books written around 1992-1994 on
the fall of the Soviet Union. They try some strategic reviews of the
russian governments since Yelstin became seriously ill. Then, when you have
done that, you can make accurate comments on Russia - cos right now you dont
understand a thing.
> Aaron R. Kulkis
> Unix Systems Engineer
> DNRC Minister of all I survey
> ICQ # 3056642
>
> L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
> can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> K: Truth in advertising:
> Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
> Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
> Special Interest Sierra Club,
> Anarchist Members of the ACLU
> Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
> The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
> Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
>
>
> J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
> The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
> also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
>
> I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
>
> H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> you are lazy, stupid people"
>
> G: Knackos...you're a retard.
>
>
> F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
> E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
> her behavior improves.
>
> D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> ...despite (C) above.
>
> C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
>
> B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
> method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
> direction that she doesn't like.
>
> A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: mlw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Intel versus Sparc
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 17:09:19 -0400
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Figured it couldn't be compiler bugs! After some
> more dicking around with cleaning up some of
> the myriad of warnings, I noticed that the
> bad function was pushing an array of structures
> onto the stack. Looking at the size of the array,
> found it was 64 Mb!
>
> At that point, we realized that the Intel platform
> was the cause of the trouble (not to mention the
> dumb way of allocating/using such a large buffer).
> The code had been originally developed on a SparcStation.
>
> So, be careful about thinking PC's are the best
> things around, just because they are much more
> powerful than they used to be.
What you are talking about has nothing to do with the "Intel." It has to do
with the operating system AND/OR the compiler.
You must admit, even if reluctantly, passing a 64M structure is a bit extreme,
wouldn't you? Depending on how either the OS or compiler environment sets up
the data heap and stack, it is quite possible for a huge stack usage to grow
the stack to the point where it either corrupts the heap or crosses a protected
boundary. Remember programming 101 where you saw of the stack grows down and
the heap grows up?
Depending on how the program is laid out in memory, 64M can be quite a lot.
It has nothing to do with Intel. I have issues with Intel chips in general, but
I don't think this is something you can blame on them.
It may be an OS limitation on stack size, i.e. an empty VM page at the bottom
of the stack which causes a page fault, or a compiler/linker issue with stack
vs heap layout. Either way, it has nothing to do with the chip being used.
--
I'm not offering myself as an example; every life evolves by its own laws.
========================
http://www.mohawksoft.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Drew Roedersheimer)
Crossposted-To:
gnu.emacs.help,alt.religions.vim,alt.religion.emacs,fj.editor.vi,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Tired of XEMACS, moving to VIM
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:03:03 GMT
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:15:24 +0200, Nils Zonneveld wrote:
>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
<snip>
>
>On the subject of Xemacs. On DOS I used to use Multi-Edit. I have not
>used it for a long time now, but I remember it as a comfortable and
>efficient editor, unlike any editor that I use today (lets face it, VI
>is insanely unintuitive). Does anyone know if Multi Edit is in any way
>'related' to Xemacs or Emacs?
>
>Nils
vi *is* unintuitive - but only till you learn it. After that it's
unbelievably fast to manipulate text, available on just about any
UNIX machine (and even available on those other "OSs"), and nowhere
near as bloated as Xemacs - not to start a flame war here.
-DR
--
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come.
-- Victor Hugo
------------------------------
From: WesTralia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:02:42 -0500
chrisv wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> to confiscate my car, you must show up.
> >
> >Did I give you an exact date?
> >
> >a) yes
> >B) NO
>
> LOL! Maybe right after you "prove" to everyone that you're not
> actually using Windows 98, right?
>
> OUTED! LOL!
Maybe we should just show up at his house, knock on the door,
and ask his mom if we can have a look around the basement!
OUTED! LOL!
--
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chad Everett)
Crossposted-To: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 22 Apr 2001 00:39:26 -0500
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001 23:44:00 GMT, Bob Hauck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, 21 Apr 2001 22:28:40 GMT, Chad Everett
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Trouble is homosexuals are a politically vocal group who want to shove
>> their sexuality down the throats of everybody else
>
>Are there gays coming to your house to do demonstrations? What do you
>mean by this statement?
>
>
>> who want to treat it as a purely moral issue.
>
>And you are surprised that people don't take kindly to being classified
>as "immoral" so they can be discriminated against?
>
>
>> They want to teach my children all about homosexuality and prevent me
>> from saying one word in protest about it.
>
>The point of telling them about homosexuality isn't to make converts,
>it is to let kids who think they might be gay know that they are not
>the only ones who feel that way. The rate of suicide among gay teens
>is quite high. Do you suppose being told how immoral they are might
>have anything to do with it?
>
Thanks for proving my point.
That is one big fat lie and you know it. Be honest. I've attended some
of these "information sessions" in public schools. They are blatant
indoctrination sessions designed to teach kids that homosexuality is
a normal, desirable lifestyle. In one of them, they had the gall
to start teaching about MY religion, telling the kids that it was
false and intolerant. It's OK for them to teach the kids about MY
religion in a derogatory and demeaning manner. What do you think
would happen if I wanted to teach the kids about my religious beliefs
in a public school?
------------------------------
From: "Joseph T. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Aaron Kuklis Arrested!
Date: 23 Apr 2001 21:09:27 GMT
Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: In Silicon Valley, where most tech. companies are located, there are a lot
: of jobs requiring MSCE (or at least state that it is a bonus).
Tech companies by definition don't need MSCEs. If they are so
ignorant of technology that they think any M$ certification means
anything other than ability to memorize M$ propaganda, then they
certainly do not deserve to be called "tech companies."
Joe
------------------------------
From: Nigel Feltham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 - It is an excellent product
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:23:58 +0100
Chad Everett wrote:
> On 23 Apr 2001 18:54:50 GMT, Neil Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hullo posted:
> >>Wonderful product from Microsoft. Go get it and get used to the
> >>future dudes.
> >
> >Is there a demo version?
> >
>
> there are some pretty good screensavers for Linux that simulate a
> Microsoft BSOD. That should serve as a pretty good demo for ya.
>
There is one in the xscreensaver package included in most (all?) distro's
unfortunately it also simulates Mac, Amiga and a couple of other
equivalents of the BSOD and seems to have no options to only select one
system to simulate.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Intel versus Sparc
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:10:57 GMT
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 17:09:19 -0400, mlw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>the stack to the point where it either corrupts the heap or crosses a protected
>boundary. Remember programming 101 where you saw of the stack grows down and
>the heap grows up?
Impossible with a properly set up MMU. The stack and heaps are not
contiguous.
------------------------------
From: Ace Agincourt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:11:54 +0100
Hi Aaron,
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:35:08 -0400,
"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
put fingers to keyboard and tapped away writing:
? Ace Agincourt wrote:
? >
? > Hi ChrisV,
? >
? > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:00:36 GMT,
? > chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
? > put fingers to keyboard and tapped away writing:
? >
? > ? Ace Agincourt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
? > ?
? > ? >? >So you think a man who throws a young child on an unexploded hand
? > ? >? >grenade, to save himself, has committed no crime, moral or legal?
? > ? >?
? > ? >? No, I think he is stupid and a murderer.
? > ? >?
? > ? >? Stupid because thatīs a silly way to try to save yourself from a
? > ? >? grenade (Itīs probably faster to try to jump away or throw the
? > ? >? grenade instead).
? > ? >
? > ? >So a man who throws himself onto a grenade, lobbed into a football
? > ? >stadium, is being stupid, not a hero, as it's a silly way to save
? > ? >others' lives.
? > ?
? > ? Shut up, you f'ing retard! Sheesh, you are the stupidest pile of puke
? > ? I've ever seen post in here! And that is saying something!
? >
? > Rudeness will get you nowhere.
? >
? > ?
? > ? Attempting to throw a small child on a hand grenade is NOT as
? > ? effective as throwing your own, much larger, body on it, OBVIOUSLY,
? > ? you God-damned idiot. Now go away and take you assinine questions
? > ? with you!
? >
? > How about a person who throws (ahem - pushes) a 400 pound woman on the
? > grenade?
?
? That would be killing two birds with one stone
Under the old imperial system of measurements, 400 pounds is over 28
stones, not one as you suggest. One stone is fourteen pounds, the
weight of a healthy six month baby.
?
? 1) saving all of those who would be injured by the blast
?
? 2) eliminating an idiotic, obese, whining eyesore
?
? >
? > Best wishes, Ace.
? >
? > ====================
? >
? > This story shall the good man teach his son;
? > And Crispin Crispian shall ne'er go by,
? > From this day to the ending of the world.
Best wishes, Ace.
====================
This story shall the good man teach his son;
And Crispin Crispian shall ne'er go by,
>From this day to the ending of the world.
------------------------------
From: "Erik Funkenbusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 - It is an excellent product
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:18:17 -0500
"Chad Everett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> Printing 5-6Meg JPGs to an HP 880C deskjet (on parallel port) works
> find *most of the time*. Sometimes only prints 25% to 75% of an
> image and then just ejects the paper. Really annoying since the
> high quality photo paper and inkjet cartridges are expensive.
Sounds like a driver issue to me.
> I put in a Yamaha CD_RW drive a while back so users can
> create CDs on a Windows 2K Pro box. Trouble is, Windows
> 2K Pro will only let the administrator write to the CD-RW
> drive. WIndows "online help and knowledge base": no help.
> Yamaha online help: only administrator can write to CD-RW
> drives in WIndows 2K. Easy CD Creator and NERO app: same
> answer. So Ive got this new CD-RW drive and only administrator
> can even use it. Really nice for the users, huh? A CD-RW
> drive that they can't use.
This is patently wrong. You can assign rights to do this in the local
policy editor. Just go to Administrative Tools in control panel, open Local
Security Settings, then Local Policies, User Rights. Double click on "Load
and Unload device drivers" and click "Add" and choose the users or groups
you want to be able to burn CD's.
> See how easy Windows 2K is to use for users?
That's why it it's called "professional". That's also why Whistler personal
will be simplified for these tasks.
------------------------------
From: Nigel Feltham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Windows 2K is crappy: a couple of examples
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:32:35 +0100
> Moved the CD-RW drive to a SuSE 7.1 Linux box and with a few easy
> and well documented permission settings on a device file and I've
> got a CD-RW drive that normal users can use to create CDs.
>
I recently upgraded the CD burner in my dual-boot win98se / mandrake 7.2
machine from a 2x2x6 speed unit to a 12x10x32 speed unit - the result on
booting into linux was the system showed no indication that the hardware
had changed but burning a CDRW disc resulted in a complete disc in about 6
minutes compared to 35 mins with the old drive.
I then booted into win98 - with my existing software I could only burn a
CDRW at 4x speed so I installed the Adaptec EX-CD software supplied with
the new drive - the result of this was the machine refused to boot and
just bluescreened during the boot process. It took nearly 2 hours of
internet browsing to find the cause of the problem - the file SCSI1HLP.VXD
installed by the software conflicted with my DVD drive.
There - upgrading a CDRW drive on linux just works without any hassle yet
upgrading on windows kills the OS and takes hours to find the cause
(without linux to browse with to find details of problem I'd have had to
spend most of this week reinstalling Windblows and every application I use).
------------------------------
From: "Erik Funkenbusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Windows 2K is crappy: a couple of examples
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:20:00 -0500
"Chad Everett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Moved the CD-RW drive to a SuSE 7.1 Linux box and with a few easy
> and well documented permission settings on a device file and I've
> got a CD-RW drive that normal users can use to create CDs.
Well documented? About as well documented as the Windows settings to do the
same thing.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 17:21:53 -0400
WesTralia wrote:
>
> Chad Everett wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:13:44 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >WesTralia wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Roberto Alsina wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Aaron, why are you so scared of women?
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> This is a question that needs asking? Hmmm... let's see:
> > >>
> > >> a) he has never had a date.
> > >
> > >15 girlfriends, lots of sex, no dates.
> > >
> >
> > 1. May 1980 Penthouse centerfold.
> > 2. May 1981 Penthouse centerfold.
> > 3. May 1982 Penthouse centerfold.
> > 4. May 1983 Penthouse centerfold.
> > 5. May 1984 Penthouse centerfold.
> > 6. May 1985 Penthouse centerfold.
> > 7. May 1986 Penthouse centerfold.
> > 8. May 1987 Penthouse centerfold.
> > 9. May 1988 Penthouse centerfold.
> > 10. May 1989 Penthouse centerfold.
> > 11. May 1990 Penthouse centerfold.
> > 12. May 1991 Penthouse centerfold.
> > 13. May 1992 Penthouse centerfold.
> > 14. May 1993 Penthouse centerfold.
> > 15. May 1994 Penthouse centerfold.
> >
> > Lot's of sex: Right hand, left hand, right hand, left hand.....
> >
>
> Aaron's hatred of women is really starting to perfectly fit the
Hatred of male-hating sexism =/= hatred of women.
> profile of an adult male living in his domineering mother's basement.
Leave your living arrangements out of this.
>
> --
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: "billh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:23:45 GMT
"Roberto Alsina"
> >> Remains a blatant assertion? Indeed!
> >
> >Truth quite often is blatant.
>
> So are lies.
Such as stating a soldier killing in war equates to murder.
------------------------------
From: "billh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:26:18 GMT
"Roberto Alsina"
> >In most of the US, a citizen owns guns simply because they choose to. No
> >other reason is required. Freedom is simply choice.
>
> Blah. What an empty discourse. Aaron (who I asked) already
> gave his reasons. And they were the exact ones I guessed.
To you it may be empty. To millions of Americans it is not. The only
reason I, as an American, need to own a gun is that I choose to own a gun.
That is a fact. That is the simple "blatant" truth.
------------------------------
From: "billh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:27:49 GMT
"Roberto Alsina"
> >Bill gave you the law.
>
> Actually, that's not the law. That's a shallow description of the law.
You obviously know little about US law.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 17:27:59 -0400
theRadical wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:26:20 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >theRadical wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:49:32 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >theRadical wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:31:15 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >theRadical wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:06:25 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >the Democratic Party is a bunch of Marxists, who, knowing that using
> >> >> >> >the name Communists would be bad PR, engage in a campaign of deception
> >> >> >> >to get the populace of the country to vote for their own enslavement.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >ANYBODY who seeks to enslave others sacrifices any claim to his own life.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Hope that helps.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> which means soooo [sic] much coming from a fucking idiot twat such as
> >> >> >> yourself.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Gonna come say that to my face?
> >> >>
> >> >> i'm still waiting for you to show up to repossess my vehicle and
> >> >> explain your ridiculous theory that a ship captain is nothing more
> >> >> that a paper pusher.
> >> >
> >> >Spot the strawman arguments.
> >>
> >> strawman? you threatened to confiscate my car as part of you duties
> >> as a law enforcement officer.
> >
> >Wrong on two counts.
> >
> >I said, by your logic, I should, as a government agent, be able
> >to confiscate your car
>
> wrong, you said you WERE a government agent
Yes, I am.
> and that you WERE going to
> confiscate my vehicle because you WANTED to.
When I feel like it, I will. Because you have not proved
sufficient NEED for it.
>
> >
> >> to confiscate my car, you must show up.
> >
> >Did I give you an exact date?
> >
> >a) yes
> >B) NO
>
> C) so fucking what?
>
> at least you admit that you were going to show up, flip flopper.
>
> you are nothing more than an arrogant hateful asshole liar.
Yes, I admit, I am arrogant and hateful when I lie to assholes.
>
> >
> >hope that helps
>
> the kulkis strategy:
>
> attack, dodge, attack, accuse, dodge.
close
Audi, Dodge, Audi, Accura, Dodge.
>
> >
> >
> >> when you show up, we will converse. what makes that a strawman
> >> argument?
> >>
> >> you are the liar with the ridiculous arguments. your accusation of
> >> strawman arguments is a joke.
> >
> >
> >So says the scarecrow maker.
>
> so says the lying asshole who can't back up anything he says.
>
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> when you show up, i will say that and much more, twat.
That's not a very female accepting thing to say.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Rebbechi)
Subject: Re: Why left-wing communist assholes hate Reagan. (was Re:
Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.)
Date: 23 Apr 2001 21:28:44 GMT
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:30:12 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
> Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:49:05 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 07:26:48 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>> >> > Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Are you aware that, according to feminist doctrine, ***ALL*** sex
>> >> >> > between men and women (including consensual sex between a husband
>> >> >> > and wife) is rape.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Nonsense. It's true that there are feminists this extreme, but it's
>> >> >> certainly not true that all feminists are like that. That's sort of
>> >> >
>> >> > That's their official doctrine now.
>> >>
>> >> More nonsense. To presume that there is one "official doctrine" called
>> >> feminism is as silly as to suggest that there is one called conservatism.
>> >
>> >I define "official feminist doctrine" as what kind of laws they try to
>> >get enacted.
>>
>> Who's they? And if you answer "the feminists", I'm gonna puke all over
>> you.
>
> Andrea Dworkin
A radical extremist. You're using a circular argument here -- you're starting
with the premise that feminism is defined by a group of radicals, and then
concluding the same.
--
Donovan Rebbechi * http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/ *
elflord at panix dot com
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
