Linux-Advocacy Digest #993, Volume #33 Fri, 27 Apr 01 13:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males ("You've got MALE.. sex organs!")
Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop ("You've got MALE..
sex organs!")
Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Re: Exploit devastates WinNT/2K security (Bob Hauck)
Re: NT is stagnant while Linux explodes (Roy Culley)
Re: Another Windows pc gets Linux (Bob Hauck)
Re: Primary and secondary missions (chrisv)
Re: Richard Stallman what a tosser, and lies about free software (Roberto Alsina)
Re: Women's rights and responsibilities. (chrisv)
Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (chrisv)
Re: IE ("Michael Pye")
Re: Has Linux anything to offer ? ("David E. Smith")
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Chad Everett)
Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (Ian Davey)
Re: Bill Hudson admits that he, Dave Casey, V-man and Redc1c4 are liars.
("billh")
Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (Ian Davey)
Re: Bill Hudson admits that he, Dave Casey, V-man and Redc1c4 are liars.
("billh")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "You've got MALE.. sex organs!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:24:03 -0500
I *must* be a "pussy-whipped piece of shit" because I'm not a little
right wing macho turd who can't get laid..
"Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
>
> "You've got MALE.. sex organs!" wrote:
> >
> > Again, it is a mystery as to why you'd be so fearful of the little
> > girlies, with all that arsenal..
>
> False premise = 15 point penalty.
>
> Hope that helps, pussy-whipped piece of shit.
>
> >
> > "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> > >
> > > "You've got MALE.. sex organs!" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Just as long as you're armed, right, you pathetic little right wing
> > > > turd?
> > >
> > > Clue for the clueless: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT issues me a fully-automatic
> > > M-16, and as much ammo as I need.
> > >
> > > As well as training me on machine guns, combat pistols, grenade launchers,
> > > rocket launchers, and missile launchers.
> > >
> > > YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK
> > >
> > > HOPE THAT HELPS, feeb.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > "You've got MALE.. sex organs!" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Spot the right wing dufus, who fears women..
> > > > >
> > > > > Ah yes, the old, tired, worn-out shaming ploy.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have no fear of women. I distrust the courts.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "You've got MALE.. sex organs!" wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Translation: the girls back home won't touch Aaron, in spite
> > > > > > > > of his brushes and M16..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Spot the slander.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "You've got MALE.. sex organs!" wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I understand the wimmen really go for those unix programmer geeks
> > > > > > > > > > nowadays. But just for SEX, they want to screw the little geeky
>brains
> > > > > > > > > > out - certainly not for dating!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > They particularly like that gynophobic disposition, developed over
>a
> > > > > > > > > > lifetime of not getting laid, or even a smell.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Right, you pathetic little right wing turd unix programmer geek?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm also
> > > > > > > > > A soldier
> > > > > > > > > and an artist.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Of course, most foreign women appreciate intelligence more than their
> > > > > > > > > American counterparts...so... they get the rewards.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Roberto Alsina wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 22 Apr 2001 18:44:43 GMT, MH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Any man who supports Feminism is a self-flagellating
>idiot.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Any man who thinks a woman should be paid the same for
>equal work is a
> > > > > > > > > > > > >self
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> flagellating idiot?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >No, just any man who marries one.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You prefer to marry women that get paid less? Why?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Because women *DO* less.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hope that helps.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > Roberto Alsina (maybe marrying a rich woman, so I can
> > > > > > > > > > > > become a househusband and code free
> > > > > > > > > > > > software is not such a bad idea)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > Aaron R. Kulkis
> > > > > > > > > > > Unix Systems Engineer
> > > > > > > > > > > DNRC Minister of all I survey, virgin, and gynophobe.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Aaron R. Kulkis
> > > > > > > > > Unix Systems Engineer
> > > > > > > > > DNRC Minister of all I survey, virgin, gynophobe, and right wing
>dufus
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Aaron R. Kulkis
> > > > > Unix Systems Engineer
> > >
> > > --
> > > Aaron R. Kulkis
> > > Unix Systems Engineer
>
> --
> Aaron R. Kulkis
> Unix Systems Engineer
> DNRC Minister of all I survey
> ICQ # 3056642
>
> L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
> can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> K: Truth in advertising:
> Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
> Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
> Special Interest Sierra Club,
> Anarchist Members of the ACLU
> Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
> The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
> Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
>
> J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
> The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
> also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
>
> I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
>
> H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> you are lazy, stupid people"
>
> G: Knackos...you're a retard.
>
> F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
> E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
> her behavior improves.
>
> D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> ...despite (C) above.
>
> C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
>
> B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
> method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
> direction that she doesn't like.
>
> A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: "You've got MALE.. sex organs!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:29:54 -0500
Aaron can still masturbate, whether he is left or right handed..
"Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
> >
> > Aaron> Ray Fischer wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >Ray Fischer wrote:
> > >> >> nunnayabidniz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >> >homosexuality is not genetic, it is a choice.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Why did you choose to be heterosexual?
> > >> >
> > >> >because successful DNA are those that reproduce.
> > >>
> > >> That isn't an answer. Why did YOU CHOOSE to be heterosexual?
> > >>
> > >> >There are only two explanations for homosexuality
> > >>
> > >> That you are capable of accepting. Given your obvious bigotry and
> > >> scientific illiteracy, I'd hardly consider your opinion to be worth
> > >> anything.
> >
> > Aaron> You're either born with it (genetic), or you choose it (for whatever
> > Aaron> reason).
> >
> > Aaron> So, homosexuality is the result of either a genetic defect, or a choice.
> >
> > Aaron> There are *NO* other options.
> >
> > Either you are born left handed (genetic), or you choose to be left handed (for
> > whatever reason).
> >
> > So, left-handedness is the result of either a genetic defect, or a choice.
> >
> > There are *NO* other option.
>
> Clue for the clueless.
>
> Homosexuality is a defect, as it interferes with the organism's ability
> to successfully reproduce (yes, your only TRUE purpose is to pass your
> DNA on to the next generation)
>
> Left-handedness is a benign variance, which has little or no effect on
> the ability to reproduce, or anything else, for that matter.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> >
> > (For the irony impaired, I am just pointing out _one_ of the several
> > Kulkis logic errors in his post.).
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Hall
> > (Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
>
> --
> Aaron R. Kulkis
> Unix Systems Engineer
> DNRC Minister of all I survey
> ICQ # 3056642
>
> L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
> can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> K: Truth in advertising:
> Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
> Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
> Special Interest Sierra Club,
> Anarchist Members of the ACLU
> Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
> The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
> Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
>
> J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
> The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
> also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
>
> I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
>
> H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> you are lazy, stupid people"
>
> G: Knackos...you're a retard.
>
> F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
> E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
> her behavior improves.
>
> D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> ...despite (C) above.
>
> C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
>
> B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
> method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
> direction that she doesn't like.
>
> A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:43:56 GMT
>>>>> Edward Rosten writes:
>> 1) loads of homosexuals do reproduce. There is no correlation between
>> infertility and sexual orientation.
Edward> True, but if you don't have sex with a woman, you probably won't
Edward> reproduce.
Yes, but being homosexual is about desires, not behavior.
Women homosexuals frequently get pregnant with artificial
insemination.
>> 2) No, if that were true then the naked mole rat would not exist.
>> Evolutionarily the purpose is to assure your traits go on to the next
>> generation. This can be done by helping the offspring of close
>> relatives (see Naked Mole Rat). As there is homosexuality in virtually
>> every advanced wild animal, it seems to be a natural and widespread
>> item.
Edward> Bees exhibit this too. I don't know about other insects.
>> 3) With respect to the issue of equal rights for gays, none of the above
>> is relevant. As being homosexual in no way intrudes on the rights of
>> others, homosexuals deserve equal rights.
Edward> Amen.
>> Homosexuality is also a benign variance.
Edward> yep.
--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Hauck)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft
Subject: Re: Exploit devastates WinNT/2K security
Reply-To: hauck[at]codem{dot}com
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:45:52 GMT
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:32:16 +0200, Tomaz Cedilnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So it trusts all UIDs but root? Can't it map all users to nobody
> (distrust all UIDs)?
Yes, it can do that if you want. It is not very useful though, except
for shared read-only volumes.
--
-| Bob Hauck
-| Codem Systems, Inc.
-| http://www.codem.com/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roy Culley)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: NT is stagnant while Linux explodes
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:29:30 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tomaz Cedilnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roy Culley wrote:
>
>> Not in the Internet server market. Security in Microsoft server OS's
>> is appalling. On the desktop it is laughable.
>
> On the desktop? I didn't know there was any security.
You are correct. I humbly apologise. :-)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Hauck)
Subject: Re: Another Windows pc gets Linux
Reply-To: hauck[at]codem{dot}com
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:52:02 GMT
On 27 Apr 2001 05:04:58 GMT, Terry Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Problem #1 no network neighbourhood icon. Although I set up Samba easily on my
> Linux box, her pc lacked the above NN facility. Could I restore it ... nope.
Did you try "net use" to connect a drive letter? How about opening the
"Run" item on the Start Menu and entering a share name?
--
-| Bob Hauck
-| Codem Systems, Inc.
-| http://www.codem.com/
------------------------------
From: chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,us.military.army
Subject: Re: Primary and secondary missions
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:53:00 GMT
"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>chrisv wrote:
>>
>> "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >yes, your only TRUE purpose is to pass your
>> >DNA on to the next generation
>>
>> That's secondary to just getting laid. 8)
>
>No, you have it backwards. Propagating DNA is the primary mission.
>Getting laid is merely a supporting operation.
Duh. I was joking. Note the smiley?? You really are not very swift,
are you?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,misc.int-property
Subject: Re: Richard Stallman what a tosser, and lies about free software
Date: 27 Apr 2001 15:57:07 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:55:59 GMT, T. Max Devlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Said Roberto Alsina in comp.os.linux.advocacy on 17 Apr 2001 13:53:13
>>On Tue, 17 Apr 2001 04:18:27 GMT, T. Max Devlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
>>>>That we are not ruled by conceptual extensions of the law that exist
>>>>solely in your mind.
>>>
>>>It seems as true and correct a definition of "ethics" as I can come up
>>>with, without getting into religion. Are you not ethical?
>>
>>*I* am not ruled by conceptual extensions of the law that exist solely
>>in *your* mind. Gee.
>
>What about *your* mind, dufus?
I may be ruled by them. However this one is not one of them.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.men
Subject: Re: Women's rights and responsibilities.
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:07:16 GMT
"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>chrisv wrote:
>>
>> Even a stopped clock is right twice a day, and you're no Einstein.
>>
>> Hope that helps.
>
>Care to discuss the quantum dynamic behavior of semiconductor devices?
LOL! You like that phrase. Are those big words supposed to impress?
No, college physics was a long time ago, and I've lost the details of
this, although I never was an expert on it. (Although, unlike you, I
actually graduated with a BS in engineering.) I bet you think a of
couple college classes, with a textbook handy to pull a couple juicy
quotes from, makes YOU an expert in the field, though. What a maroon.
I'm just waiting for an expert in this field to call your bluff, so we
can all watch with amusement as you backpedal wildly and refuse to
discuss the issue, just as you did when your bluff was called in
regards to Linux kernel details. LOL!
------------------------------
From: chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:14:24 GMT
"Edward Rosten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>I still think you're a bigot.
>>
>> I still think you're a logically handicapped politically-correct idiot.
>
>You probably think I'm a big nosed gay nigger-yid, because I'm neither
>racist, anti-semetic or homophobic.
>
>And this is what I think of you:
You slander me, based on zero evidence, and when I respond in a
negative manner, you simply "up the anti" on the unsubstantiated
slander.
What a piece of garage you are.
------------------------------
From: "Michael Pye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.destroy.microsoft
Subject: Re: IE
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 17:11:15 +0100
"T. Max Devlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> >Until it collides head first with 'cola logic', at which point it will be
> >summarily dismissed as troll bait.
> >As most, if not all facts are in cola.
>
> As a long-time user of NS4, I would say it is definitely not troll bait.
> Its just plain old bullshit.
User? You can't comment until you have tried to develop for it. How do you
know how the sites are supposed to look? You don't even know that you are
getting the version that is stripped down at the server side to try and
offset the inadequacies of your browser.
MP
------------------------------
From: "David E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Has Linux anything to offer ?
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:52:03 +0000
Last time, on the hit series comp.os.linux.advocacy,
David Dorward shocked the world by saying:
>> Does it boot up and shut down quicker than other operating systems?
> This system is currently set up to duel boot, although as I've got Unreal
> Tournament running under WINE I might dump Windows all together. But it
> loads a lot faster the Windows ME and shuts down faster too.
Why? Unreal Tournament runs natively under Linux...
...dave
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chad Everett)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 27 Apr 2001 10:53:41 -0500
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 13:16:30 GMT, T. Max Devlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Said Joseph T. Adams in alt.destroy.microsoft on 24 Apr 2001 21:28:13
>>In comp.os.linux.advocacy T. Max Devlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>:>: How does eating fish on fridays connect to loving my neighbour?
>>:>
>>:>You may be confusing the teachings of a particular sect (the Roman
>>:>Catholic Church) with those of Christ. They're not necessarily the
>>:>same thing.
>>
>>: Well, I'm afraid you have to pick your sect before you can say anything
>>: at is the "teachings of Christ". He didn't necessarily even exist.
>>
>>There is ample evidence for the life of Christ. There are very few,
>>if any, historians who doubt His existence. Most of those who are not
>>Christians doubt the veracity of the Biblical accounts of His life,
>>but that is an entirely separate issue.
>
>According to a panoply of theists and philosophers who have been
>investigating this very issue for several years (known as "The Jesus
>Project"), this is quite incorrect. You might mistake the claims of
>those within the sects we speak of as providing some authority, but I
>assure you it does not. Whether there was any one man who corresponds
>to the Jesus Christ of the Bible is at best conjecture. At best, he is
>an amalgam, composed primarily of myth. Certainly, anyone who doubted
>that any man that might correspond to Jesus Christ is some specific way
>existed would be overdoing it, but claiming that historians do not doubt
>"His" existence is, as well.
>
T. Max, please don't post about what you know little about. First, I think
you are confusing "The Jesus Project" with "The Jesus Seminar". If anyone
wants to know about The Jesus Project, just go to www.jesusproject.com
and you'll see that everything T. Max has said is incorrect. Anyone who
does an unbiased research into the historical Jesus has (and will) find
that Jesus was an actual man that existed. Some people will claim, as
T. Max has done, that Jesus is an "amalgam, composed of myth", but of
course, using their criteria, exactly the same thing can be said about
Aristotle and many other historical figures. There is more direct
evidence for the historical Jesus than there is for Aristotle, for
example.
If T. Max mistakenly cited "The Jesus Project" instead of "The Jesus
Seminar", then using The Jesus Seminar as a reference on the historical
Jesus is like using The Democratic National Party as a reference for
the validity of Conservatism.
>>The prohibition against eating meat on Fridays was a rule of the Roman
>>Catholic Church, not a teaching of Christ, and it is no longer in
>>effect, except in Lent. It hasn't been for decades.
>
>And until they changed their mind, they claimed that this 'rule' was the
>word of God, same as you or any other sect would like to claim that
>Jesus's words were.
>
The Catholic Church will claim a lot of things
as the word of God, because it's what the Pope says is the word of God.
In the Catholic Church, there does not have to be any basis in what is
written in the Bible. You are trying to confuse people by using
what the Catholic Church says is the word of God with what is written
in the Bible. They are often not the same thing.
>>If you want to discuss Christianity, it would be a good idea to learn
>>a little more about it.
>
>Well, believe it or not, I was well aware that fish on fridays was no
>longer mandated by the Pope, since I was in about the seventh year,
>IIRC, of my twelve years of Catholic schooling, when it was announced.
>
My closest friend was well educated in Catholic schools (elementary,
middle, high school) and his knowledge of the Bible is extremely
spotty and full of errors. Catholic schools and most Catholic churches
teach very little about the Bible and quite a lot about Catholic
theology. Using your Catholic education as a certificate of your
knowledge of scripture doesn't fly.
>>Roberto would be well advised to do the same.
>>He is very knowledgeable about KDE, among other things, and you are
>>knowledgeable about many things as well. But neither of you
>>demonstrates any grasp of the fundamental teachings of Christianity at
>>all, and that makes it fairly difficult to have a rational discussion
>>about it.
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: soc.singles
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Davey)
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:24:07 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
>>
>> Well, let's see.
>>
>> Gays use sex much the same way hets do; as a method of recreation,
>> excercise, sharing, comforting, bonding, play, relaxation, stress relief,
>> expression of love, to increase closeness and intimacy, and so on. So one
>> would conclude that if homosexuality is detestable, so is all sex.
>
>And John Wayne Gacy used knives the same way butchers do; as a method
>of carving up carcasses into single-serving portions of meat.
>
>So, your point is?
You've got a very strange view of the world. You hear descriptions of loving
relationships and immediately think of John Wayne Gacy... I'm surprised you
didn't jump for necrophilia. I'd be interested in your explanation of what one
has to do with the other though. Why do you equate the two?
You seem to use shock tactics to avoid answering reasonable questions as
though you're afraid to actually think about what is being said. Hence the
constant use of one liners. Christianity does seem to instill something of a
disgust about sex in a lot of its devotees though.
ian.
\ /
(@_@) http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/ (dark literature)
/(&)\ http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/libertycaptions/ (art)
| |
------------------------------
From: "billh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles,soc.men,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.military.folklore
Subject: Re: Bill Hudson admits that he, Dave Casey, V-man and Redc1c4 are liars.
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:27:15 GMT
"chrisv"
> >> Your problem, Bill, is that you are utterly uncreative when it comes
> >> to matters where maximum creativity counts.
> >
> >Is that what you call your lies and your BS excuses and cover you use
when
> >you are proven wrong? I've never heard of that definition of
"creativity"
> >before.
>
> That was a very transparent scramble from Kookis, wasn't it? Typical
> from him, twist and writhe in the wind any way he can to avoid the
> obvious.
>
> You're wrong, Kookis. Be a man and admit it FOR ONCE.
He'd rather continue his little dance. LOL!!!
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Davey)
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:28:20 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Homosexuality is a defect, as it interferes with the organism's ability
>to successfully reproduce (yes, your only TRUE purpose is to pass your
>DNA on to the next generation)
So how many kids do you have then? And why are you so happy to reduce us to
the level of animals (living merely to reproduce and all our intellectual
faculties meaning nothing).
So by your logic, Turing , father of modern computer science had no purpose in
being as he didn't father any children. Should we just drop all our
technology, go back to caves and start breeding?
ian.
\ /
(@_@) http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/ (dark literature)
/(&)\ http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/libertycaptions/ (art)
| |
------------------------------
From: "billh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles,soc.men,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.military.folklore
Subject: Re: Bill Hudson admits that he, Dave Casey, V-man and Redc1c4 are
liars.
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:31:30 GMT
"Aaron R. Kulkis"
> *CAN* it perform strategic airlift?
> a) no
> b) yes
When full of fuel, what is the max cargo capacity of the C130, idiot? What
speed and what range will it be capable of with that cargo when at max fuel,
KuKuNut? The C130 does not perform strategic airlift as it is not designed
to. You can not name an instance where it has performed strategic airlift.
Continue your waffle, wannabe. We like to see you dance. You are pathetic.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
