Am Tue, 22 Jul 2014 03:26:39 +0000 (UTC) schrieb Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>:
> Marc Joliet posted on Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:30:22 +0200 as excerpted: > > > And now that the background deletion of the old snapshots is done, the file > > system ended up at: > > > > # btrfs filesystem df /run/media/marcec/MARCEC_BACKUP > > Data, single: total=219.00GiB, used=140.13GiB > > System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=36.00KiB > > Metadata, DUP: total=4.50GiB, used=2.40GiB > > unknown, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00 > > > > I don't know how reliable du is for this, but I used it to estimate how much > > used data I should expect, and I get 138 GiB. That means that the snapshots > > yield about 2 GiB "overhead", which is very reasonable, I think. Obviously > > I'll be starting a full balance now. > [snip total/used discussion] No, you misunderstand: read my email three steps above yours (from the 21. at 15:22). I am wondering about why the disk usage ballooned to >200 GiB in the first place. -- Marc Joliet -- "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
