At 11:55 PM 6/30/99 -0500, Alan & Susan Mead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>SAY, I just had a great idea or a crappy one (I cannot tell): would it be
>helpful (beyond the current thread's educational value) to, say, publish one
>bad item each day during item writing, dissecting how it could be better?
>(We wouldn't want to publish the killers.) Would that help you all to be
>better item writers? I know you are probably mostly confident but so was
>the poor soul who wrote the "Johnny" question below and look where he/she
>went...
I actually think that this is a good idea.
I would also say that we should ask a small group of people who did not
write the test to sit the exam, or review the tests, as well. This will
expose them to an audience of people other than the test item writers.
I would be prepared to sign a non-disclosure on this round, and then review
the test items.
Regards
-------
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], NS Computer Software and Services P/L,
Samba (Team member www.samba.org), Ethereal (Team member www.zing.org)
Co-author, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours
________________________________________________________________________
This message was sent by the linux-cert-program mailing list. To unsubscribe:
echo unsubscribe | mail -s '' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
