2007-01-13: EV dixit: > [...] > Now I'll try to find which changeset first introduced the recent > bug(s).
First version showing smalldb update/write regression is Changeset 127 (`Fix an obvious resource leak') Then this is reverted in Changeset 129 (`Fix boneheaded ret variable confusion'), which behaves as the vanilla libkarma-0.0.6 with respect to USB smalldb saving (i.e., the original size shrinking bug is still there, but smalldb is left consistent and no Segmentation Fault is produced). Finally, as posted in my first message today, Changeset 130 (the current tip) leads to riocp segfault upon writting smalldb, which results fully corrupted and useless. I'll wait until this night for Bob reactions, before trying to find the original bug starting from Changeset 126. Best, EV. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-karma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-karma-devel
