2007-01-13: Bob Copeland dixit: > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 05:00:39PM +0100, EV wrote: > > 2007-01-13: EV dixit: > > > [...] > > > Now I'll try to find which changeset first introduced the recent > > > bug(s). > > > > First version showing smalldb update/write regression is > > Changeset 127 (`Fix an obvious resource leak') > > Yes, 127 "fixed" a resource leak but basically busted everything else. > However I tried several uploads with all of my latest patches and didn't > get a segfault
I get segfault *without* uploading anything; just "./riocp" Can I take for sure that the current tip (changeset 130) contains all your patches? > or the shrinking smalldb (an off-by-one problem). AS I said, this bug has been there at least until Changeset 129. So you mean your latest patches (changeset 130) should fix the shrinking bug? > I'll test again later on today when I get some time. Any > backtrace on that crash? I'll produce it later on. > BTW I would use the test harness in the repo but I think we are > missing some stuff in there?? I couldn't figure out how to > make it work with a few minutes of messing with it. I've never used these tests. There are so many functionalities in libkarma that I doubt any test suit can reassonably account for all the important issues... My tests are rather informal, but I am usually very lucky at finding bugs ;) Best, EV. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-karma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-karma-devel
