On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > But generally: linux will send fake RSTs only via my corpse. > If firewalls will start to use RST instead of ICMP, we have to > ignore RST in established state. Is it good? The question is rethoric. Sorry to disappoint you, but I thought the firewalls sent RST if you specified 'reject' on a TCP packet... Taral - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Matti Aarnio
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Tim Fletcher
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* st... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Paul Rusty Russell
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Bernd Eckenfels
