On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, Tim Fletcher wrote: > Not always, consider a firewall that is partway though boot, and as a > security measure puts a deny all on the external interface until the boot > process is finished, and then finally runs a firewall setup script. I said REJECT, not deny. Anyone who puts a general reject rule when booting deserves what they get. Taral - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Paul Rusty Russell
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Dan Hollis
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Alan Cox
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Matti Aarnio
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Tim Fletcher
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Paul Rusty Russell
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Jamie Lokier
