Taral wrote: > > I assumed that's you meant by: > > > > > Does anyone know why connections aren't aborted when ICMP dest > > > unreachables are received while in the SYN_* states? Esp. if they > > > contain the TCP packet which was sent (inc. seq num) > > > > What did you really mean? > > I was wrong, it seems. ICMP is checked for in tcp_ipv4.c in all cases. Well the point about sending RSTs from the firewall still holds, since there are _other_ hosts that don't abort the connection. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Alan Cox
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Matti Aarnio
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Tim Fletcher
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* st... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Paul Rusty Russell
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Bernd Eckenfels
