On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How did the packet reach this firewall? Firewall (if it is not > embedded to destination host) cannot differ packets lost in the internet > of "administaratively obeyed" to it. > It is pretty common case in networks of topology different of trivial. Real firewalls are on the path from source to destination. If the packet matched a REJECT filter rule once, it will do so again if the packet is resent. Taral - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Paul Rusty Russell
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Dan Hollis
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Alan Cox
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Matti Aarnio
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Tim Fletcher
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Jamie Lokier
