Taral wrote: > > So the present behaviour of ignoring ICMP policy reject+port unreachable > > during TCP Syn setup is correct? > > Are you sure it does that? tcp_ipv4.c doesn't appear to ignore those... I assumed that's you meant by: > Does anyone know why connections aren't aborted when ICMP dest > unreachables are received while in the SYN_* states? Esp. if they > contain the TCP packet which was sent (inc. seq num) What did you really mean? thanks, -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Paul Rusty Russell
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Dan Hollis
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Alan Cox
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Matti Aarnio
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Tim Fletcher
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* st... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Paul Rusty Russell
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Bernd Eckenfels
