On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Jamie Lokier wrote: > I assumed that's you meant by: > > > Does anyone know why connections aren't aborted when ICMP dest > > unreachables are received while in the SYN_* states? Esp. if they > > contain the TCP packet which was sent (inc. seq num) > > What did you really mean? I was wrong, it seems. ICMP is checked for in tcp_ipv4.c in all cases. Taral - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Dan Hollis
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Alan Cox
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Matti Aarnio
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Tim Fletcher
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* st... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Paul Rusty Russell
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Bernd Eckenfels
