Mike Cropper - Parkside wrote: > ...for anyone but geeks. > > I'm evaluating Linux as an alternative to Windows NT in a large organization > (more than one million seats), but so far I am completely unconvinced that > this OS has any chance of upsetting the market equation. Hi first of all excuse me for my english....... I'm italian :-) Is true that in linux is hard to install new software, but on the other side in Windows the problem AFTER the installations of new software are many. I work for a big organization that have many computer with windows-office but the phonecall for problem with windows related software are too much versus the number of problem related with Linux. Linux is hard to start but windows is too hard to manage and make continuos work. Regards FABIO
- Re: Linux is too hard to configure... Richard Adams
- Re: Linux is too hard to configure... Akintayo Holder
- RE: Linux is too hard to configure... Peter Schuller
- RE: Linux is too hard to configure... Douglas H. Ort
- RE: Linux is too hard to configure... Bennet Kelly
- Re: Linux is too hard to configure... Ron Marriage
- Re: Linux is too hard to configure... David Johnson
- RE: Linux is too hard to configure... willh
- Re: Linux is too hard to configure... Mike Werner
- Re: Linux is too hard to configure... David Hajoglou
- Re: Linux is too hard to configure... Fabio
- Re: Linux is too hard to configure... Richard Adams
- RE: Linux is too hard to configure... Brent Johnston
- FW: Linux is too hard to configure... Richard Greenwood
- Re: Linux is too hard to configure... Nicholas Campleman
- Re: Linux is too hard to configure... Richard Adams
- Re: Linux is too hard to configure... Steve Youngs