Why not? I used to agree. I liked the menu.lst being "dynamic" and not having to rewrite the MBR, but what is the difference, since it's basically just running lilo again. This gives you the ability to verify that you didn't create a bad menu.lst file...
begin "Ken Moffat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 03 Nov 2002 11:55:17 -0800 breathed forth: > Collins wrote: > > If they would just modify LILO not to > > require updating every time you change the lilo.conf, I would be > > content to use LILO. > > > > This is my reason for Grub usage. I find grub simpler, and it works > well. I was surprised when redhat7.3 defaulted to grub, so just went > with it for all my installs, modifying the menu.lst to accommodate new > > kernels. As long as redhat stays in place grub functions well with my > several distros and a constantly changing setup. > _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
