On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:00:35 -0800 Tony Alfrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 November 2003 01:23 pm, Kurt Wall wrote: > > Quoth M.W. Chang: > > > better than open office? > > > > Yup, in the same way that single malt scotch is better than > > Listerine. > > > > Kurt > > On this thread, someone commented that they had pretty good success with > OO and textmaker re: Word format docs. Just for grins, I loaded up OO > and opened up a Word doc that someone just sent me. Looked pretty > wierd in OO but looked perfect with textmaker. > I've gone both ways OO->Doc and vice versa. The key to getting good results (for me at least) is to have identical fonts. If you are going to do this on a regular basis, you really need a copy of the Windows fonts available to OO. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
