On Sunday 29 July 2001 23:17, Collins Richey babbled:
> But this group is more than just the provider. It would be a common
> courtesy to
> let the rest of the group know when you decide to make a major change in
> the support policies. There may be others (and there are) who have equally
> valid
> viewpoints.
>
there were no changes made. this list has ALWAYS been using DNS blacklisting.
> I won't. I haven't seen any spam on this list or the Caldera list - maybe
> once
caldera's is a closed list. this one is not
> 1. You provided no warning for this unilateral action. Nobody has a clue
> when they get a "return address denied by mail service" message. I tried
> unsubscribing and resubscribing, but that did no good. The icing on the
> cake was when you also denied any mail to your own mail address, so that
> no one could even find out what had happened. Not a good approach (tm)
> for a service provider. Finally, Mike Andrew let me know what you were up
> to.
again, I made no changes to this machine. DNS blocking was always there and
always on. Perhaps orbl simply updated their records...
And the return message should have stated "You have been blocked by
or.orbl.org" . The message that Pam forwarded to me does have that message in
there...
> 3. You say, "fine, no more orbl," but my original account is still blocked
> by
> your server.
should not be. in fact, no way. the machine has been bounced twice today
(fscking power instability).
--
Douglas J. Hunley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Linux User #174778
Admin: http://hunley.homeip.net/ Admin: http://linux.nf/
Brainbench Linux Administration Certified
~~ Now offering Linux admin services for the home user ~~
Drag queens are just guys who like to eat, drink, and be Mary.
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
