Jim Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Much of the fighting is over ICANN itself, and comes from the fact that
>ICANN operates in secret.  A good deal of the fighting is in fact a
>form of speculation:  people are arguing over different interpretations
>of ICANN's intent, or what today's version of the ICANN bylaws really
>mean.

But the fighting existed even back in the IAHC days.

>Calm comes from confidence and understanding.   ICANN can easily take
>actions to increase both.  The simplest is to make the meetings of the
>ICANN board open.

It seems ICANN is damned if it does, and damned if it doesn't.

--gregbo

__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________

Reply via email to