Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of the dnso

[Anonymous]

>So, it seems to me a better idea that declaring
>the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list as the regular expression
>of the general assembly of the DNSO would be to
>use the IFWP list for that purpose; it may take months
>or perhaps even a year to get the dnso list to the size
>the ifwp list.
>
>Are there any reasons why this shouldn't be done ?

The only obstacles that I can see are:

  (1) ifwp is, as far as I know, completely unmoderated without any rules 
for participation, civility, etc. Participation would be enhanced by the 
addition of such rules; 

  (2) as far as I know, ifwp is not archived, and we'd want to start 
keeping copies of the general assembly list; and 

  (3) new participants may be confused by the name of the list.

But these are trivial and could be changed easily.

   -- Bret