I have a much more elegant solution. Simply adopt the
NSO rules as is; that is the names council decisdes
who to eject. They can live or die by that. I just
do the technical administration of the list and make
no decisions as to content or who can or cannot post
here.
At 12:26 PM 6/26/99 -0500, Gene Marsh wrote:
>Removal from any public discussion list is a touchy subject. Perhaps, if
>you are to implement such a policy, it should be with the review of two or
>more individuals so as to avoid any accusation of personal vendetta.
>
>Gene...
>+++
>Hi Richard J. Sexton, you wrote on 6/26/99 9:22:00 AM:
>
>>At 08:47 AM 6/26/99 -0400, Bret A. Fausett wrote:
>>>So, it seems to me a better idea that declaring
>>>the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list as the regular expression
>>>of the general assembly of the DNSO would be to
>>>use the IFWP list for that purpose; it may take months
>>>or perhaps even a year to get the dnso list to the size
>>>the ifwp list.
>>>
>>>Are there any reasons why this shouldn't be done ?
>>
>>The only obstacles that I can see are:
>>
>> (1) ifwp is, as far as I know, completely unmoderated without any rules
>>for participation, civility, etc. Participation would be enhanced by the
>>addition of such rules;
>>
>>Ok, what if the [EMAIL PROTECTED] rules were adopted immediately ?
>>
>>The only rule I can find on www.dnso.org is
>>
>> "Anybody can subscribe to this list, however, the Names Council
>> reserves the right to remove subscribers from the list -after a
>> warning- if they use the list to slander or insult others."
>>
>>Which is probbaly something we should do anyway.
>>
>> (2) as far as I know, ifwp is not archived, and we'd want to start
>>keeping copies of the general assembly list; and
>>
>>Yes, they are, http://lists.ifwp.org/archive
>>
>> (3) new participants may be confused by the name of the list.
>>
>>No problem, every [EMAIL PROTECTED] that exists is now set up
>>@dnso.com, but goes to this list.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>"They were of a mind to govern us and we were of a mind to govern
>>ourselves."
>
>
>
>+++++++++++++++++++++
>I'm very happy @.HOME
>Gene Marsh
>president, anycastNET Incorporated
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"They were of a mind to govern us and we were of a mind to govern ourselves."
