On Sat, Jun 26, 1999 at 03:20:42PM -0400, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> >
> >If you hand over this list to the DNSO, you betray a trust.
>
> I agree with you 100%. I'm just saying why bother with a new
> list that only 53 poeple subscribe to and 13 post to be
> the opinions of the general assembly of the dnso. Why not
> just recognize the fact that list list has a far greater
> technical, legal and administrative diversity ("a good thing")
> and take the comments here to, n practical terms, represent
> the general expression of people who are interested in
> domain issues, whch some may label the dnso.
>
> Please rest assured I would never make any unliateral
> decsions about this list. I was just floating an idea
> that I thought would serve both parties well.
No thanks.
--
Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- RE: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Richard J. Sexton
- RE: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Roberto Gaetano
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembl... Jeff Williams
