frankly.....
i dont believe that any truly public list like should be moderated with
exception of the the normal caveats for advocacy of violence, religious &
ethnic slurs etc.
we all have filters and if anyone gets sick and tired of reading someone's
postings then they can filter them out on their own mail clients

ken stubbs
----- Original Message -----
From: Gene Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 1999 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of the dnso


Removal from any public discussion list is a touchy subject.  Perhaps, if
you are to implement such a policy, it should be with the review of two or
more individuals so as to avoid any accusation of personal vendetta.

Gene...
+++
Hi Richard J. Sexton, you wrote on 6/26/99 9:22:00 AM:

>At 08:47 AM 6/26/99 -0400, Bret A. Fausett wrote:
>>So, it seems to me a better idea that declaring
>>the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list as the regular expression
>>of the general assembly of the DNSO would be to
>>use the IFWP list for that purpose; it may take months
>>or perhaps even a year to get the dnso list to the size
>>the ifwp list.
>>
>>Are there any reasons why this shouldn't be done ?
>
>The only obstacles that I can see are:
>
>  (1) ifwp is, as far as I know, completely unmoderated without any rules
>for participation, civility, etc. Participation would be enhanced by the
>addition of such rules;
>
>Ok, what if the [EMAIL PROTECTED] rules were adopted immediately ?
>
>The only rule I can find on www.dnso.org is
>
>        "Anybody can subscribe to this list, however, the Names Council
>        reserves the right to remove subscribers from the list -after a
>        warning- if they use the list to slander or insult others."
>
>Which is probbaly something we should do anyway.
>
>  (2) as far as I know, ifwp is not archived, and we'd want to start
>keeping copies of the general assembly list; and
>
>Yes, they are, http://lists.ifwp.org/archive
>
>  (3) new participants may be confused by the name of the list.
>
>No problem, every [EMAIL PROTECTED] that exists is now set up
>@dnso.com, but goes to this list.
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>"They were of a mind to govern us and we were of a mind to govern
>ourselves."



+++++++++++++++++++++
I'm very happy @.HOME
Gene Marsh
president, anycastNET Incorporated

Reply via email to