At 11:50 AM 6/26/99 -0400, Michael Sondow wrote: >Richard J. Sexton a �crit: >> > >> So, it seems to me a better idea than declaring >> the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list as the regular expression >> of the general assembly of the DNSO would be to >> use the IFWP list for that purpose; it may take months >> or perhaps even a year to get the dnso list to the size >> the ifwp list. > >Are you suggesting giving the IFWP to Elizabeth Porteneuve or some >other CORE operative to use for their purposes? No, I'm just saying that this lisy should be the "regular expresion of the general assembly of the DNSO" if I got the language correct. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] "They were of a mind to govern us and we were of a mind to govern ourselves."
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- RE: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Richard J. Sexton
- RE: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Roberto Gaetano
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembl... Jeff Williams
