Richard, You wrote: > The [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list has 53 members. > > The IFWP list has 156 members. > Well, in this case, why not having the general discussion on the DNSO on the IETF list, that has far more members? ;>) Jokes apart, my point is that the purpose of the mailing lists is to focus on discussion on specific subjects. The IFWP fulfills a role for general discussions on ICANN and Internet Governance, while the DNSO GA is focusing on Domain Names. To have everything in one list will be much more work from the reader's part to sort out the subjects. Regards Roberto
- RE: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembly of ... Roberto Gaetano
- Re: [IFWP] regular exprssion of the general assembl... Jeff Williams
