>zittran:
>
>All this said, I'm curious: how do we measure that elusive thing
>called consensus? And, on the merits, do you think any one entity,
>whether NSI or MCI or CORE or anyone else, should pick three seats
>to the Names Council? ...JZ
>
oh horse shit counsellor: lets get the facts straight...... this top
level domain constituency has been articificially resytricted by
ICANN. there are circa 240 top level domains..... and inlcuding many
not in the current rootservers. ICANN has ar ticially and narrowly
defined this one such that NSI is the only qualified constituent. In
this context it is really disingenuous for you to ask such a
question....
you pro ICANN biases are showing once again
****************************************************************
The COOK Report on Internet Index to seven years of the COOK Report
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA http://cookreport.com
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) The only Good ICANN is a Dead ICANN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] What's Behind ICANN and How it Will
Impact the Future of the Internet http://cookreport.com/icannregulate.shtml
****************************************************************
