hello crisp, tiny said it best -- The notion of diversity is anathema
to their approach. It's a religion, not a process.
>On Sat, Jul 10, 1999 at 12:26:00PM -0400, Gordon Cook wrote:
> > >zittran:
> > >
> > >All this said, I'm curious: how do we measure that elusive thing
> > >called consensus? And, on the merits, do you think any one entity,
> > >whether NSI or MCI or CORE or anyone else, should pick three seats
> > >to the Names Council? ...JZ
> > >
> >
> >
> > oh horse shit counsellor: lets get the facts straight...... this top
> > level domain constituency has been articificially resytricted by
> > ICANN. there are circa 240 top level domains..... and inlcuding many
> > not in the current rootservers.
>
>If they are not in the current root servers, they are not top level
>domains. They are private domains.
>
> > ICANN has ar ticially and narrowly
> > defined this one such that NSI is the only qualified constituent.
>
>Nonsense. There is an entire ccTLD constituency.
>
> > In
> > this context it is really disingenuous for you to ask such a
> > question....
> >
> > you pro ICANN biases are showing once again
>
>The depth of your thinking would put a jackrabbit to shame.
>
>--
>Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
****************************************************************
The COOK Report on Internet Index to seven years of the COOK Report
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA http://cookreport.com
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) The only Good ICANN is a Dead ICANN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] What's Behind ICANN and How it Will
Impact the Future of the Internet http://cookreport.com/icannregulate.shtml
****************************************************************
