Re: [IFWP] Re: Rule of law vs. consensus

[Kent Crispin]

On Sat, Jul 10, 1999 at 12:26:00PM -0400, Gordon Cook wrote:
> >zittran:
> >
> >All this said, I'm curious: how do we measure that elusive thing 
> >called consensus?  And, on the merits, do you think any one entity, 
> >whether NSI or MCI or CORE or anyone else, should pick three seats 
> >to the Names Council?  ...JZ
> >
> 
> 
> oh horse shit counsellor:  lets get the facts straight...... this top 
> level domain constituency has been articificially resytricted by 
> ICANN.  there are circa 240 top level domains..... and inlcuding many 
> not in the current rootservers.

If they are not in the current root servers, they are not top level 
domains.  They are private domains.

>  ICANN has ar ticially and narrowly 
> defined this one such that NSI is the only qualified constituent.

Nonsense.  There is an entire ccTLD constituency.

> In 
> this context it is really disingenuous for you to ask such a 
> question....
> 
> you pro ICANN biases are showing once again

The depth of your thinking would put a jackrabbit to shame.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain