At 06:31 PM 7/11/99 -0400, cgomes wrote:
>John,
>
>Let me see if I get this straight. It's okay for ICANN to establish
>policies that affect the NSI Registry even if the NSI registry has no
>representation?
>
>Chuck
Such unmitigated gall. The NSI registry is THE registry, unfortunately. These
are not issues to be lobbied (I'm still recovering from an ROFL over the
notion
in one article I read wherein NSI claims to be "new to the lobbying game")
but to be resolved in the interests of the internet as a whole. NSI will play
the "representation" card with one hand while arbitrarily and with consummate
arrogance interposing obstacles to the development of the internet with the
other,
all the while keeping a perfectly straight face, I'm sure.
Bill Lovell
