On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, A.M. Rutkowski wrote: > I'm more than familiar with those struggles. > This why you want to avoid the characterization > of being a public resource - and why conversely > the GAC has adopted an international agreement > stating Internet Name and Number systems are > public resources. Being a public resource > means that governments will ultimately control > it. http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/scripts/rammaker.asp?s=real&dir=icann&file=DNSO-GA-052599&start=3-37-30&end=5-25-30 I was very surprised to see Dr. Paul Toomey at the GAC Open Meeting treatening the world with such statements as, If ICANN fails, governments would take over the function. Regards Jeff Mason -- Planet Communication & Computing Facility [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public Access Internet Research Publisher 1 (212) 894-3704 ext. 1033
Re: [IFWP] Internet stability
Planet Communications Computing Facility Tue, 3 Aug 1999 07:22:57 -0700
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stabilit... Craig McTaggart
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stab... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stabilit... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stab... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Internet ... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Inter... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Internet ... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Inter... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] ... Planet Communications Computing Facility
- Re: [IF... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IF... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IF... Planet Communications Computing Facility
- Re: [IF... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IF... Planet Communications Computing Facility
- Re: [IF... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] ... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IF... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IF... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Ronda Hauben