I understand now. Mark complained to me and i told him to go ahead and filter me out. It's all in my email. But Mark felt compeled to begin his complaining in public - even though I feel I have adequately dismissed his complaint. I posted the private email - simply because I have no need to repeat myself again. I am a firm believer that you say what you mean and you mean what you say. Mark did not understand that and I hope you assist him in understanding he has the option to follow my advise. So do you. As I have said before here over and over again - I believe in self censorship, but not in it's imposition. Feels free to filter me - I feel that the american way - which I support. Regards Jeff Mason -- Planet Communication & Computing Facility [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public Access Internet Research Publisher 1 (212) 894-3704 ext. 1033 On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Gordon Cook wrote: > > basic netiquette jeff mason, if I send you a message to you alone it > generally is because I don't want to take a disagreement into the > public domain.....to take the contents of a private message and make > them public without the permission of the sender is just not > done.....defining private message as generally one to one.... I can > read the mime email OK. But many are operating with equipment that > makes this impossible..... what wrong with doing them a common > courtesy and refraining from it? > > Your early style was not that bad. But you are picking on the wrong > person in picking on mark langston, so for what ever its worth I am > on the verge of tuning you out..... > > > > > >Hello Mark: > > > >On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Mark C. Langston wrote: > > > > > > > > I will also demand that you refrain from posting private e-mail without > > > the prior written consent of the author. > > > > > > However, since you chose to ignore that particular convention as well, > > > I'll go ahead and point out that where I said MTA I of course meant to > > > say MUA. > > > >I don't understand - who's consent would that be? I'm not sure who's > >permission I have to get. > > > >Regards > >Jeff Mason > > > >-- > >Planet Communication & Computing Facility [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Public Access Internet Research Publisher 1 (212) 894-3704 ext. 1033 > > **************************************************************** > The COOK Report on Internet Index to seven years of the COOK Report > 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA http://cookreport.com > (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) The only Good ICANN is a Dead ICANN > [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's Behind ICANN and How it Will > Impact the Future of the Internet http://cookreport.com/icannregulate.shtml > **************************************************************** >
Re: [IFWP] Government takeover of Internet (fwd)
Planet Communications Computing Facility Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:16:21 -0700
- [IFWP] Government takeover of Int... Planet Communications Computing Facility
- Re: [IFWP] Government takeov... Mark C. Langston
- Re: [IFWP] Government ta... Planet Communications Computing Facility
- Re: [IFWP] Government takeov... Mark C. Langston
- Re: [IFWP] Government ta... Planet Communications Computing Facility
- Re: [IFWP] Governmen... Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] Gover... Planet Communications Computing Facility
- Re: [IFWP] ... Gordon Cook
- Re: [IF... Planet Communications Computing Facility
- Re: [IFWP] ... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IF... Planet Communications Computing Facility
- Re: [IFWP] Government takeov... BrandonButterworth
- Re: [IFWP] Government ta... Jeff Williams