JEffM and all,
I feel the same way here Jeff, and have stated so on more than
one occasion. However I do not censor anyone as a matter of
practice. I try to respect everyone's input, whether I like their input
or not, is not really relevant.
Planet Communications Computing Facility wrote:
> I understand now. Mark complained to me and i told him to go ahead and
> filter me out. It's all in my email. But Mark felt compeled to begin his
> complaining in public - even though I feel I have adequately dismissed his
> complaint.
>
> I posted the private email - simply because I have no need to repeat
> myself again. I am a firm believer that you say what you mean and you
> mean what you say. Mark did not understand that and I hope you assist him
> in understanding he has the option to follow my advise.
>
> So do you.
>
> As I have said before here over and over again - I believe in self
> censorship, but not in it's imposition. Feels free to filter me - I feel
> that the american way - which I support.
>
> Regards
> Jeff Mason
>
> --
> Planet Communication & Computing Facility [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Public Access Internet Research Publisher 1 (212) 894-3704 ext. 1033
>
> On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Gordon Cook wrote:
>
> >
> > basic netiquette jeff mason, if I send you a message to you alone it
> > generally is because I don't want to take a disagreement into the
> > public domain.....to take the contents of a private message and make
> > them public without the permission of the sender is just not
> > done.....defining private message as generally one to one.... I can
> > read the mime email OK. But many are operating with equipment that
> > makes this impossible..... what wrong with doing them a common
> > courtesy and refraining from it?
> >
> > Your early style was not that bad. But you are picking on the wrong
> > person in picking on mark langston, so for what ever its worth I am
> > on the verge of tuning you out.....
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >Hello Mark:
> > >
> > >On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Mark C. Langston wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I will also demand that you refrain from posting private e-mail without
> > > > the prior written consent of the author.
> > > >
> > > > However, since you chose to ignore that particular convention as well,
> > > > I'll go ahead and point out that where I said MTA I of course meant to
> > > > say MUA.
> > >
> > >I don't understand - who's consent would that be? I'm not sure who's
> > >permission I have to get.
> > >
> > >Regards
> > >Jeff Mason
> > >
> > >--
> > >Planet Communication & Computing Facility [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Public Access Internet Research Publisher 1 (212) 894-3704 ext. 1033
> >
> > ****************************************************************
> > The COOK Report on Internet Index to seven years of the COOK Report
> > 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA http://cookreport.com
> > (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) The only Good ICANN is a Dead ICANN
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's Behind ICANN and How it Will
> > Impact the Future of the Internet http://cookreport.com/icannregulate.shtml
> > ****************************************************************
> >
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
