Working within ICANN lends legitimacy to an innately illegitimate enterprise. There has never been any public vote for privatization or any vote for ICANN. Please do not ignore that the would-be emperor still wears no clothes. -- ken >On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Einar Stefferud wrote: > >> In my view, ICANN is no longer worthy of further attention, >> as their deliberate intention is to disenfranchise all of us. >> >> We need to find our own solution to the new TLD problem, and the >> cooperative maintenance of the Virtual Inclusive Root. > > Partick Greenwell replied: > >Burying your head in the sand and wishing the problem away won't make it >so. > >Ignore ICANN to your own detriment.
- [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Ken Freed
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
