On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, at 19:08 [=GMT-0400], Michael Sondow wrote: > Marc Schneiders wrote: > > > ICANN is way more clear than > > any alternative I know of. > > IFWP=Institute For Wankers and Poltroons? Could we keep this to basic 2000 words English for those, like me, whose native language is another? Come on.
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Ken Freed
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] "working within ICANN" Richard J. Sexton
